Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WonderKing Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 18:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WonderKing Online

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:N or find an ATD. Boleyn (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:42, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. IGN, a generally reliable source, have multiple articles on the subject. Engadget, another generally reliable source, has an article. Other articles were found in a Google search. I believe enough coverage is available to pass WP:GNG. NemesisAT (talk) 22:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This reference (included on the page) https://nlab.itmedia.co.jp/games/titles/wonderking.htmllists 14 articles on that site relating to this game. I believe itmedia.co.jp qualifies as an WP:RS.Thisisarealusername (talk) 07:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.