Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang Römer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang Römer

Wolfgang Römer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:SOLDIER and significant RS coverage not found: link, in either German or English. Article is largely sourced to primary documents. Bibliography includes a source from questionable publisher J.J. Fedorowicz. No de.wiki article. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 02:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete. Possible selective merge to 653rd Heavy Panzerjäger Battalion. Note there is an unrelated submarine officer with same name.[1]. I'm not as sure of the RSness of [2][3] (that K.e.coffman is calling out a questionable - hence I'm cagey on the merge) - however coverage of this individual seems to be quite limited (so - I do not see him passing GNG even if this were a RS). Whether to selectively merge some of this would depend on the RSness.Icewhiz (talk) 06:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- The Germans were too profligate in awarding knights' crosses at the end of WWII for this alone to constitute notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.