Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiggle Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the references given by User:Ruby Murray. (non-admin closure) Ethically ^(Yours) 15:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiggle Ltd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is an advertisement for a corporation with a reasonably large turnover and no inherent notability. Fiddle Faddle 14:59, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - I exhaustively combed the web and could only find this article [[1]] talking about their new interns. Definitely needs to be deleted. Great catch, bro! BlueSalix (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrading to Strong Delete and recommend WP:SALTing as PR-cruft. BlueSalix (talk) 19:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve - seems fairly notable, with a lot of good secondary coverage online from WP:RS.

Mainstream press:

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/sep/17/humphrey-cobbold-wiggle-interview
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/oct/23/cycling-retailer-wiggle-considers-ipo
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8801255/Wiggle-cycles-to-flotation-or-sale.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8657102/Wiggle-rides-to-10m-success.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/news/the-business-on-humphrey-cobbold-chief-executive-wiggle-6274504.html
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/public/Appointments/article1020987.ece
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-2071334/Online-cycling-retailer-Wiggle-sold-Bridgepoint-180m.html
http://www.theretailbulletin.com/news/wiggle_appoints_new_chief_executive_as_humphrey_cobbold_departs_04-09-13/

Cycling mags:

http://www.bike-eu.com/Sales-Trends/Webretailing/2011/12/Bridgepoint-To-Take-Over-Wiggle-BIK005476W/
http://www.cyclosport.org/21-May-2013/news/champions-of-cyclesport-dinner-2013-teams-up-with-wiggle.html
http://www.britishcycling.org.uk/search/article/20121214-welsh-cycling-news-Wiggle-to-sponsor-Women-s-Pro-Cycling-Team-0
http://cyclingtips.com.au/2012/03/interview-with-humphrey-cobbold-ceo-of-wiggle/ Ruby Murray 17:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrading to Strong Keep I've removed the copyrighted promotional junk added by a company employee, and added a history section using the references above (plus another I found from the DT). It certainly meets Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) with the level of press coverage it's received, and no longer has a promotional tone. Ruby Murray 11:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve. The sources provided above by User:Ruby Murray demonstrate that this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.