Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands bus routes 246, 300, 311 and 313

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands bus routes 246, 300, 311 and 313

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of several obsessively long, generally unsourced articles about West Midlands bus routes, several of which have already been deleted at AfD. This one has been unsourced for years and I can't see any rationale either for combining these disparate routes into one article - maybe it's the Dudley connection? Either way, the "Present" section (and External links) is travel info so falls into WP:NOT. The unsourced History section looks like it may be WP:OR and/or personal knowledge. It's probably time this article reached its terminus, or is retired to some other more suitable wiki (or bus fan website). Sionk (talk) 23:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom nothing but buscruft that belongs on WikiTravel or Wikivoyage. -Davey2010 • (talk) 00:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Unreferenced article with no significant topic coverage found in reliable third-party sources. As Davey2010 says, can be trans-wiki'ed if so desired. Philg88 ^♦talk 06:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY and issue of WP:IINFO. --Jersey92 (talk) 17:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above.Charles (talk) 07:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.