Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands bus route 94

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands bus route 94

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet more West Midlands bus cruft cited only to the bus company website. I don't know why it was rescued from AfC. These articles have been routinely deleted at AfD, lacking any evidence of notability. Clearly fails WP:GNG in my view. Sionk (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article and all that crap in the template ought to go too, Why on earth this was rescued I'll never know!, Anyway per nom nothing but buscruft and belongs on WikiTravel or Wikivoyage. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unsourced and absolutely no indication whatsoever of being notable. I am really struggling to think of any bus route that is notable at all. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N and WP:NOT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesdrakew (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.