Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walsh Bros
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to John Walsh (filmmaker). (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Walsh Bros
- Walsh Bros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page is a violation of WP:REDUNDANTFORK. It's almost entirely copied from the article John Walsh (filmmaker). Luthien22 (talk) 19:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Luthien22 (talk) 19:47, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Merge whatever is new to John Walsh (filmmaker), and then delete per being a redundant fork. But as it is a searchable term, we can redirect to the John Walsh article after deletion. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Merge to John Walsh (filmmaker) if there is anything worth keeping, if not just redirect per User:MichaelQSchmidt. --Cerebellum (talk) 05:55, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 22:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 22:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.