Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE 2K (Mobile Game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 06:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WWE 2K (Mobile Game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As an article that says nothing about this game other than its release date, price and key features it is spam. Most of it is based upon a press release published by the WWE site (as licencee, not independent), the remainder being two brief announcements in gaming websites that do not themselves appear to be notable, so notability is not established. RichardOSmith (talk) 06:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete. No sources to show notability. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/Merge – Currently the only coverage from secondary source game websites is the press release announcement stuff. For now, I would suggest redirecting to WWE 2K per WP:TOOSOON. It might expand enough in the future to split off into a separate article again. Also this article needs renaming, "G" shouldn't be capitalised in "Game". – The1337gamer (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/Merge - It is a notable video game. The editor just didn't use the notable source. See this one from GameSpot and VideoGamer.com. Notability is definitely established. ~~However, its problems is that it violates copyright as the entire gameplay section is copy from WWE.com directly.~~ Now that it is removed, I agree with The1337gamer's point. It is too soon to have the article. AdrianGamer (talk) 05:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the original copyrighted text was re-inserted by the original author including the pricing info - removed again but I suspect it will be put back.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for now, with the possibility of a full-fledged article in the future. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 17:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not a crystal ball, including spam. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real content beyond advert for a product yet to be released. No indication that this is notable.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.