Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vostok (crater)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Timeline of Opportunity#Heat Shield Rock and stuck in sand. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vostok (crater)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extremely minor impact feature. According to a recent paper, there are over 90 million impact craters greater than 25 metres in size across the entirety of Mars [1]. In comparison, there are only 385,000 craters over 1 km in diameter.[2] Very little to say about the crater itself. Only really notable as part of the mission of Opportunity (rover), I propose a redirect to Timeline_of_Opportunity#Heat_Shield_Rock_and_stuck_in_sand where it is already covered. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Not notable as a geographic feature, can just be discussed as part of the Rover's path. Reywas92^Talk 00:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable at all. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 07:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Reywas. The crater is only significant in the context of Opportunity. –dlthewave ☎ 16:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Reywas. PianoDan (talk) 17:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. Redirects are cheap. Femke (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom, it makes sense and is co vered there. Star Mississippi 17:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.