Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velvet Eden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Unsourced and keep vote was by assertion. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Velvet Eden

No reliable sources found. Note that the Castle Records linked to in the article is not the right label. Reads like a fansite. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Albums & single added too. Will the closing admin please see that the albums' and single's cover art, and the categories Category:Velvet Eden songs and Category:Velvet Eden albums are deleted too? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 12:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:17, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I usually support keeping most Asian celebrities and food articles, but this one doesn't have any reliable sources even if they have put out a few songs (I found them on YouTube; you can go see for yourself). Also, the Castle Records linked to in the article really isn't the right label... Lady Galaxy 18:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 02:33, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't have enough music background or Japanese to evaulate the website of the Castle Records they were signed with to tell whether they pass WP:MUSIC #5. It looks like it might be an important enough indie label that I can't dismiss the band's notability out of hand. Can we get an assist here? —Quasirandom (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I note btw that that second link (which was on the main article), along with its subpages, does verify at least the discography portion of the article. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Velvet Eden - no opinion on album articles. The band has sufficient notability to warrant a page on wikipedia --T-rex 15:40, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.