Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velaro, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Velaro, Inc.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this article serves no significance and most likely should be treated as not notable. however if it's expanded and sourced well then the deletion is not necessary it's just that I have not found any independent articles regarding this company yet. If I am wrong then please let me know why ‍ Tom Joe James 📝 💬 Wanna talk? | 📝 Contributions 18:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sourced to database entries and partnership announcements (fail WP:ORGIND). WP:BEFORE finds nothing else. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article does not qualify for soft-deletion, as PROD was once declined.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 22:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH --Devoke water 12:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.