Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veera Brahmam Gari Matham, Vijayanagaram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Veera Brahmam Gari Matham, Vijayanagaram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Unreferenced, WP:NOTABILITY Vin09 (talk) 07:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Badly constructed article, but the topic seems to be Notable. You find better info in a search by not using the word "Vijayanagaram," which is a geographic location. Needs better sourcing, and it's already marked as such. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BeenAroundAWhile:You find better info in a search by not using the word "Vijayanagaram," which is a geographic location. Brahmamgari Matham article already exits in wikipedia.--Vin09 (talk) 07:36, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unsourced article about an indeterminate topic. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No RS, not about a notable subject. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.