Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vamana Maharaja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:N. Sources were added but the subject still fails the policy. PeterSymonds (talk) 06:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vamana Maharaja

I can not locate any citation or links to any sources to assume that he should be on Wikipedia. No links whatsoever. MBest-son (talk) 22:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

then what is Sri Prabandhavali ISBN 81-86737-00-6 Syama (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable with no reliable sources, questionable sources at best. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 16:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have found an online copy of the source (which was already cited in the article before this AfD was started) and have linked the article to it. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article is still about a non notable. Also, sources are questionable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, even with the source, this person doesn't seem to be all that notable. Staying weak, as I suppose it's possible that there might be more texts in Indian languages about this person. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.