Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Super Mario game (Wii U)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Super Mario game (Wii U)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried prod as "No title. We can wait for some more info before we WP:CRYSTALBALL, can't we? Delete, per WP:HAMMER". But the article says "It was announced during an interview with El Mundo and Eurogamer.", so it is likeliest based on an official information release and not on someone's guessing or rumor. And I have had a request in my user talk page to history-merge it with New Super Mario Bros. Mii: "Since Untitled Super Mario game (Wii U) is based on the tech demo (as it says in the article), shouldn't it be moved & history merged with New Super Mario Bros. Mii? SNS (talk) 03:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Whoa there, why send it to AfD while there is still an uncontested PROD!? Salvidrim! 05:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was contesting it, because it was caught up in a history-merge request which someone put in my user talk page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to merge. WP:TOOSOON, WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 10:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as prodder. There are some words but zero info in this article. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as crystal ballism. Let's at least wait until it has a name. JIP | Talk 20:10, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. SL93 (talk) 01:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Just delete this because there's nothing NEW!!!![reply]
Delete without prejudice per WP:CRYSTAL. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON and somehwat WP:CRYSTAL. Recreate when a proper title is known. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 20:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.