Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twink (home perm)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Twink (home perm)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

@Espresso Addict: @MrDemeanour: Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable Chidgk1 (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and England. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I do see one source for the proposition that the band was named for the product, but that is insufficient for encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 00:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks significant coverage Wolfson5 (talk) 20:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.