Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twinflix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 09:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Twinflix

Twinflix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable and even speedy and PROD material with the best search links here. Pinging tagger MuZemike and also video game users Czar, Comatmebro, Bovineboy2008, SoWhy, Esquivalience, Wizardman, NinjaRobotPirate, Flyer22 Reborn, SuperHamster, The1337gamer and Salvidrim. SwisterTwister talk 22:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. An indie mobile puzzle game made in France? That hits every one of my weak points. I'll say that I did a WP:VG/RS Google custom search, and I found very little. Metacritic and GameRankings have a sole review cataloged. However, I'm no good at finding reviews for indie games, puzzle games, or mobile games, so I don't really trust my searches. I'm familiar with very few Francophone video game sites, but I checked JeuxVideo.com, and there was nothing there. I'd probably say it's non-notable, but I'll wait to see if anyone else can find something. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I guess delete, then. I understand Salvidrim's reluctance to delete, but there's always MobyGames for an all-inclusive database of video games. Honestly, I might have just added the single review and tagged it with notability. I'm turning into a push-over. But since we're here... NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Je parle français. I'll look for sources as soon as I have a few moments. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 23:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delkeep - I can't justify voting to delete an article about a game that has any reviews in reliable sources, but this game only has one that I could find, so I'd be silly to advocate keeping. I'm conflicted. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 02:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, preliminary voting delete for now: doing a search, notability is unlikely. The fact that it is self-published (the gaming media only gives some prominence to indie games), the sole developer is virtually unknown, and it is very similar to Tetris decreases the likelihood of sources existing. Searches of Google + a few large databases (including French ones) result in no mentions yet alone sources. Unsourced for three years with about 3,000 potential visitors that could have added sources on the article. Esquivalience ^t 02:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as failing WP:GNG with only a single source that I can find (mentioned above). —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 15:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.