Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tufail Ahmad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 08:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tufail Ahmad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced biography of a living person. All references are by, not about the subject. bender235 (talk) 21:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes, the article does not currently have the requisite sources, but such sources exist. Here are two sources in fairly well-known news websites, that give him non-trivial coverage; 1 and 2. IMO, these meet the requirement set out in WP:BIO. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A Notable person, might need better sourcing not deletion. -sarvajna (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I do know that this article is not very strong at the moment, but Wikipedia is a work in progress. For me, the notability of the subject is clear from the fact that major newspapers and magazines have invited him to write regular columns. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.