Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Wood (British businessman)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fairly strong consensus to keep, with only the nom. supporting deletion. (non-admin closure) ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 00:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Wood (British businessman)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established by article. Only appointed as Chief Executive of Meggitt in 2018 so has been in the role 4 months max and prior to that had not held CEO or Chairman roles in any other business. On that basis I would say it's too soon for an article here Uhooep (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- "No actual reason given for deletion." It's not the business of the article to establish notability, it's the business of the sources found by the nominator during WP:BEFORE. In this case there are plenty. See Reuters, The Times, The Telegraph. Could go on. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 17:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 17:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He is the CEO of a FTSE-250 UK company, a Fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society, and there is enough coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CEO of a FTSE-250 UK with over £2 billion in annual revenues, former senior management at Rolls Royce, and MBA from INSEAD Business School, aligned on WP:GNG, though article can still be expanded as is rightly happening. Simone2049 (talk) 04:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unanimous to 'keep', with votes in a row. I would recommend AfD on page is removed, and notice placed on article to edit and improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simone2049 (talk • contribs) 04:37, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.