Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tigarah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tigarah

Tigarah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet notability criteria, very brief and very few mentions in external sources. Written with a promotional tone. Flagged in June but no significant improvements since then. ツStacey (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete - One of the sources is dead and a 404. Japan Times [1] has an additional article which qualifies for WP:RS but she never did release a 3rd album in 2013 meeting WP:N and she never charted in Oricon [2]. Article has nothing to merit WP:MUSICBIO and is heavily slanted towards promotion. Jun Kayama 17:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as simply none of this suggests even a minimally better article. SwisterTwister talk 20:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Searched for both English and Japanese sources, nothing would suggest notability. sst✈ 11:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.