Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Parisch
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas Parisch
- Thomas Parisch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Thomas Parisch" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
No indication that the subject is notable. Sources are primary or just mention or list subject with no significant coverage. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ · cont) Join WER 02:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 16:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails GNG by way of WP:COMPOSER. Similar to or exactly the Laurent Zilani AfD, no one has shown the Resi6 soundtrack to be a notable composition. Vanity page and not encyclopedic. czar · · 16:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:27, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a little different from Ziliani, for instance Parisch is featured on the website of Variety, which is a very solid reference.107.200.61.89 (talk) 08:46, 4 November 2012 (UTC) — 107.200.61.89 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete as not notable. Obviously part of an effort to gain free advertisement for PearUp Media related people as evidenced by the spa accounts involved.--Atlan (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources. The Variety item noted above is (I assume) this item which is not coverage about the subject, but rather an ASCAP profile and is simply a directory entry amongst many other ASCAP profiles. -- Whpq (talk) 14:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not passing WP:GNG, same concerns as on the other AfD. I see directory entries and listings with short description, but no in-depth coverage as required by GNG. WP:COMPOSER#1 also is not met at this time. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_Parisch&oldid=1138869011"