Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Henry Scott Galletly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure} Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Henry Scott Galletly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: neither being a brigadier nor being awarded the military cross is sufficient to be regarded as notable. Delete. Bristolbottom (talk) 18:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As a brigadier, recipient of the Military Cross and participant in several WWII campaigns, doesn't he meet WP:SOLDIER? Dcfc1988 (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a brigadier with a DSO seems to meet WP:SOLDIER, I admit that the article needs expansion to include, inter alia, the reason for the DSO. --Bejnar (talk) 08:20, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As a brigadier, clearly meets WP:SOLDIER. Getting a bit fed up with this editor's scattergun nomination of people who clearly meet our notability guidelines. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Brigadiers are notable. James500 (talk) 07:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.