Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Adams (professor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 23:56, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Adams (professor)

Non-notable professor. According to the editor that contested the prod, he has contributed to a textbook. However, the article itself does not assert that, nor do I think that it alone would be enough to make him notable. JRP 14:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat 16:11, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn-bio. --Terence Ong 17:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn-bio. Bucketsofg 18:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per nom. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 19:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Would seem to fail the professor test >_< . — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No claim to notability. ~MDD4696 20:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep. I deleted the prod because he is credited as a contributor/coauthor of what appears to be a standard (if rather technical) reference work, not a textbook, which would meet the notability standard. Monicasdude 23:02, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment According to his website, the book is Heat Transfer Calculations. He's not listed as the author of the book, although he may have contributed to it(I can find no evidence, on amazon.com's page on the book or on mcgraw hill's page on the book, that he contributed to it). Even assuming he did, I don't think that lets him meet Wikipedia:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies/Academics --Xyzzyplugh 02:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Khoikhoi 02:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN/bio. --Ragib 06:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.