Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas-James Fisher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas-James Fisher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As a photographer, he's put out a photobook. Ah, no -- a helpfully provided link takes us here, where we learn that he had just a one-nineteenth share in the book. His picture is described (on 9 June 2014) as "English: www.thomasjamesfisher.com". I took a look. The website bills him as a photographer, but it's completely blank. The Wayback Machine has earlier versions, e.g. this one; when they too aren't blank, they're descriptions of his nights out, etc. The problem seems less that there's little written about him than that there's little for anyone to write up. -- Hoary (talk) 13:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas-James Fisher, is not an american, he is english, the wiki entry on top is wrong, but in regards to his work, you can see his is IMDB listed http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0279811/ and also has featured on photgraphy 'artist' websites http://thenewsgayper.com/qd_gallery/thomas-james-fisher/ and featured in the UK magazine http://www.mascular.co.uk/Magazine/Issue7.Autumn2013/Mascular7 (if you scroll threw) and http://thenewsgayper.com/qd_gallery/thomas-james-fisher-2/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki89london (talk • contribs) 20:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Sorry, unconstructive comment, but - OMG! This guy works in a Specsavers in Central London, and actually sold me my glasses last year. I recognised his name as it was so unusual. How SURREAL to see him popping up here... Mabalu (talk) 10:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On a more serious note, I think the notability is not there yet - he has SOME initial coverage and slight sources, but nowhere near enough yet, so for now, a regretful delete - sorry mate! (This really gets WEIRD when you've actually met the person...) Mabalu (talk) 11:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too soon for a biography. Wait for more coverage by reliable sources and recreate the page once his career has taken off. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.