Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThinkUKnow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 15:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ThinkUKnow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable, no sourcing found. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 16:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 16:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Plenty of secondary sources show that this campaign is notable, see e.g. [1] [2]. Iffy★Chat -- 21:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A WP:BEFORE found these [1], [2] and [3]. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 18:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.