Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Village at Manalapan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Village at Manalapan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This proposal went through a wide variety of ideas during its lifetime, but as of last year the project was scrapped and the land is in the works to become a pig farm. While the project did receive local press attention during project's 13 years of planning and discussions, I'd challenge the lasting notability of a project that never came close to actually getting built. Proposed development projects regularly receive local press attention, and I don't see anything lasting or special about this former project. Slon02 (talk) 17:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:57, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:57, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was also a 2012 solar farm installation. Very selective, as is in, one-line merge of content on the proposed development to Manalapan Township, New Jersey, with a reference. I suppose we could also categorize the redirect under Category:Unbuilt buildings and structures in the United States, too....? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if built, it may not have been notable. But as a proposal, with apparently just some routine local coverage of planning issues in the local paper, I would not even mention it in the Manalapan article. MB 01:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This was a flash in the pan that has burned out in its entirety. There is nothing here of enduring notability. Alansohn (talk) 04:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails GNG. Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.