Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Siblinghood of the Adjoined Orbs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Siblinghood of the Adjoined Orbs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability - 27 ghits of which the most likely says account suspended, first ref doesn't mention them, 2nd doesn't work. No justification for a merge either that I can see. Doug Weller talk 11:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nn. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 20:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DEL7 There's no reliable third party sources available to even verify the information. No need to merge as well. I will remove the merge templates after this AfD. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going ahead and removing the merge tag from the target article (Neo-Druidism). --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The last real edit was when the header was put up more than three years ago. No reason to think this is notable. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 00:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: ~~I'm also unable to find evidence for notability sufficient to maintain the page, nor sufficient supported information to include in a page on Neo-Druidism. Klbrain (talk) 22:49, 22 October 2016 (UTC)~~. Have now found one book that has the name of the group in the title: "Druidry, including: Druid, Bard, Gorsedd, Wicker Man, Druidcraft, Vates, Druids' Glass, Taillten Fair, Gorsedd Stones, Cythraul, Ritual Of Oak And Mistletoe, Dryw, The Siblinghood Of The Adjoined Orbs, Menai Massacre" by Hephaestus Books, ISBN-13 9781242678547, ISBN-10 1242678549. I haven't been able to read the book, so can't confirm the contents; but perhaps its a wiki book/mirror? I'm further confused by the talk page entry at Talk:The Siblinghood of the Adjoined Orbs which describes this as a fictional religion created by a group called "Lost and Found". Perhaps the lost and found tent at Bestival. So, overall, smells like a Bestival spoof.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.