Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shape of Things to Come (The O.C.)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. We can't keep relisting this forever, and it's clear interest in outright deletion is minimal at most. — Joseph Fox 00:48, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Shape of Things to Come (The O.C.)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously was nominated for {{prod}} in 2008; therefore, this discussion for The O.C. episode is created. Even with other previously-featured articles, this article's topic's notability is not established for years. ~~I would say delete. --Gh87 (talk) 04:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)~~ Merge and delete are not the same thing: delete blocks away revisions of an article; merge preserves previous revisions. I vote neutral for now; I will change back to delete someday if more will vote for the same thing. --Gh87 (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I haven't looked into this episode yet, but I noted the previous prod when noticing that a slew of O.C. episode articles are currently prodded.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 04:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Per WP:ATD, to a season or list of episode articles. There's no reason to delete this entirely, as it can meet V by being primarily sourced. Jclemens (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Completely unsourced. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:18, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter (state the obvious (or not)) 11:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - if even just due to utter lack of interest of editors for deletion.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 10:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or delete. It's just plot (WP:NOT#PLOT and trivia, nothing that sustains a separate article from an episode list. – sgeureka ^t•c 07:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.