Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sacred Name Broadcaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Assemblies of Yahweh. MBisanz ^talk 02:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Sacred Name Broadcaster

Advertorial coatrack for the beliefs of a religious group that has no reliable secondary sources to establish notability or to enable any independent verification of its claims Bali ultimate (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Six Google Books hits going back thirty years. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 17:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The sources don't seem to indicate more than that the magazine is published. There doesn't seem to be any sources about the magazine's notability separate from the Assemblies of Yahweh. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Assemblies of Yahweh per the lack of sources on the magazine itself. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Assemblies of Yahweh. ukexpat (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As nom have no opposition to *redirectBali ultimate (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Assemblies of Yahweh. Fails WP:BK. All references in secondary sources are just passing references of the type, "Assemblies of Yahweh also started publishing The sacred name broadcaster in 1967". Abecedare (talk) 23:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Assemblies of Yahweh per above comments. Chamal ^talk 07:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep they are loads of sources for the Sacred Name Broadcaster but because these are fairly new articles, I haven't had time to include them all. I'm very busy. A quick internet search will show. In Citer (talk) 11:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.