Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Movement Etoile d'Azur - Help with Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:06, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Movement Etoile d'Azur - Help with Art

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. An editor on the talk page has suggested the lack of coverage could be due to this being a hoax article. PhilKnight (talk) 11:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I did a bit of digging, having done some wikifying on this article. The postal address in the article is searchable – does this throw any light on the topic or the hoax allegation?
- http://www.praguesinfonia.com/content/contact.php gives it as the address of Marianne Maurer, coordinator of the Prague Sinfonia Orchestra
- http://www.avv.ch/parcours.html (and many other websites) makes it the address of Galerie Michel Foëx
- http://www.notrehistoire.ch/photo/view/6132/ implies it was the studio of Gustave Maunoir from 1910–1919

I also looked at the domain name given in the article: etoiledazur-helpwithart.org was registered on 15-Oct-2010 09:53:36 UTC by Domains by Proxy, Inc. in Scottsdale, Arizona and the website at http://www.etoiledazur-helpwithart.org/ was last modified 15 October 2010 13:49:20 – being so new, this could account for its absence from search engine indexes. — Hebrides (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From my perspective, if it isn't a hoax, then it almost certainly isn't notable, and should be deleted anyway. PhilKnight (talk) 13:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I'm not finding any coverage in Google news. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.