Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Chapel That Stood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No need to wait for another 7 days, consensus is quite clear. (non-admin closure) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 16:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Chapel That Stood

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no problem with the picture itself, but the article is not necessary, as the picture is not notable enough for an article. AMLNet49-Talk-Cont 05:57, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to article about the book. This drawing is not separately notable but the book could be, which has some reviews on Goodreads. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 06:22, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Goodreads isn't really a good judge of whether or not something passes notability guidelines as a whole, since a book can have a ton of reviews on social media review sites like Goodreads but still not gain any coverage in reliable sources. (Goodreads isn't usable as a reliable source.) So far I'm seeing where the book has been briefly mentioned, but not where it's been the focus of any in-depth coverage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Keep - ~~Non-notable watercolor. reddogsix (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)~~ Based on the work Tokyogirl did, I change my !vote to keep the article based on the book. Nice work Tokyogirl!!! reddogsix (talk) 20:26, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Tokyogirl converted the article to be about the book, not just the cover illustration, and I have expanded it and added references. The book appears to be notable, and her title "The Little Chapel that Stood" seems to have passed into general usage as a name for the chapel even when not talking about the book.[1][2] --MelanieN (talk) 15:26, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTW the book cover pictured at the article displays a gold seal, as if in recognition of some award. I can't tell what it is, and in a brief search I didn't find the book getting a major award. Anyone? --MelanieN (talk) 19:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full disclosure: since this is now a completely different article from the one that was nominated, I am notifying the nominator and earlier commenters about the change. --MelanieN (talk) 20:16, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's to mark that it's a 9/11 book or given some seal of approval by a 9/11 related board. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:18, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting per request by MelanieN, and confirming Keep. Great job Tokyogirl and Melanie and thanks for considering my suggestion. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 02:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and an oval gold seal toTokyogirl79 for transforming and referencing the article. I can't make out the wording but the image seems to be the Twin Towers. My guess is that the gold seal is for a "recommended book" sold at the World Trade Center 9/11 Memorial. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:30, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.