Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Killing Bottle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Killing Bottle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The following films are also being included in this bundle, because they are also part of the same poorly documented film series, and have also been created, moved to draft space, and re-created:

Kokusai himitsu keisatsu: shirei dai hachigo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Kokusai himitsu keisatsu: Tora no kiba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Kokusai himitsu keisatsu: Kayaku no taru (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This article has been moved to draft space at least twice and is being repeatedly re-created in article space. This article has no references, and so cannot satisfy film notability, let alone general notability. Google search shows that the 1967 film is listed in IMDB, which probably means that it exists. At this point, Articles for Deletion seems to be either the only way to get rid of this zombie page or the only way to get the film documented. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable; consider coaching creator of article about recreating articles moved to draft space. A a s i m 19:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, user is now blocked. Wonder if we can get this speedy closed as "Delete". A a s i m 23:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - You presumably mean a snow delete, since this doesn't satisfy any of the criteria for speedy deletion. As nominator, I respectfully disagree with a snow close, and think that this AFD should be allowed to run for seven days. I couldn't find sources in English, but there might be sources in Japanese. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:40, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G5. The article represents block evasion by Oliverdrinkstars57 and Special:Contributions/2601:440:C080:36F0:5CCD:B40D:5A45:8CF6. If someone is to write about the topic it should be an editor in good standing. Binksternet (talk) 17:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I respectfully disagree with User:Binksternet as to G5. The author was blocked after creating these articles, and was blocked for persistently creating unsourced content, such as these articles. These articles are the unsourced content that needs deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.