Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Inseparables (2023)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Inseparables (2023)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NFF. Should be deleted or moved to DRAFT until release

PROD removed. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Belgium, and France. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I disputed the PROD in the belief that it deserved community consensus. I am neutral in this discussion 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I would like to understand how can you judge that this article should be deleted since every fact is proven and sourced by important, national and reliable media. There are only four sources because there is not a lot of information in the article. I think that if you judge that this article should be deleted for it lacks of reliability it means that you didn't read the sources properly. I'm open to the discussion. If you want to tell me what to improve in the article I would be glad to do so, but please don't delete it.

Have a nice day. Biard Hippolyte (talk) 09:56, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Read the requirements for future films WP:NFF and then come back and explain why you think this film meets those requirements. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying the problem, I added a paragraph explaining that the first image of the film were released and that a real promo video had been shown at the american film market. All this obviously sourced by Variety, the world's leading media on the film industry. Is it enough to avoid delation? Biard Hippolyte (talk) 13:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify, too soon for an article but could be notable in the future. Suonii180 (talk) 14:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment an editor attempted to remove the AFD template from the article which I reverted since this discussion is still ongoing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify This seems like WP:TOOSOON. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 18:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.