Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fallen Madonna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 'Allo 'Allo!. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Fallen Madonna

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this fictional painting, a TV prop, notable in light of WP:GNG? The coverage is limited to plot summary plus very minor coverage of a sale of a prop and even more minor coverage related to a creation of a replica. I proposed a meger at Talk:'Allo_'Allo!#Merge_from_The_Fallen_Madonna but the merge was opposed by a single editor. I think it's time to bring this to the AfD then, given the GNG concerns. This is an amusing propr, but given the limited coverage, one that merits no more than a redirect and a brief mention in the article about the TV series, not a stand alone article. PS. Worth noting that over the last decade, the dozen or so articles about the characters from this show have been brought to AfD and all have been turned into redirects to the list of characters... (ex. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/René Artois). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 18:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 18:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 18:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 18:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I support the merger as proposed. Lacks enough importance for a standalone article but could be mentioned in the main one. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. Johnbod (talk) 02:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 'Allo 'Allo! - Not independently notable enough to warrant a split from the main article, and its role in the plot of the show is already briefly described there, but the sourced section on the real-world events regarding the prop would be appropriate to merge over. Rorshacma (talk) 17:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.