Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Book of Siavon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting that the Jessica Eppley article has already been speedy deleted by Iridescent per CSD A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Book of Siavon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable series of books. TheLongTone (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also nominating a biog of the author;

Delete both. The only source used in these articles is the author's own web site. No independent reliable sources have been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. The only 3rd party news source I can find that mentions Eppley or her series is here, where she is mentioned in passing in a sidebar as one of several authors attending an "Independent Bookstore Day" event. Both fail WP:GNG, the series fails WP:NBOOK, and Eppley herself fails WP:AUTHOR. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 18:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 18:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 18:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both, neither meet WP:GNG, nothing found apart from book selling sites, looks like WP:PROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. I can't find anything for either the books or their author to suggest that they pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both and I have speedied the author for now as there's clearly nothing at all even for any basic notability, by far nothing at all acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.