Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telephone Secrets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Telephone Secrets

Telephone Secrets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased song of no particular notability in itself; a variant ("Song No. 4 (Satellite)") later appeared as a bonus track on Yes's album Drama. Does not meet WP:NSONG. No citations provided, and none come to mind or are apparent on a web search. PROD was removed by another editor. Personally, I think it's a good song, but it does not warrant its own article. Bondegezou (talk) 20:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable bootleg song. The article XYZ (band) should also be reviewed. The previous AFD for it was corrupted by two known sock accounts (possibly a third) which affected the outcome (see below). XYZ lasted only two rehearsals before splitting, with no official output. PaulHammond2 (talk) 02:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • In a cluster of four keep votes together (3 socks and 1 sockmaster):
  • User:MegX (known sock of JamesBurns)
  • User:Anger 22 (known sock of WikiLibs, who also voted keep)
  • User:TanIrishmanSaga (contribution history indicates the account was solely set-up to vote keep)
  • Without the sock votes, the margin would have been 3 (to delete) to 2 (to keep, one of which was a weak keep). PaulHammond2 (talk) 04:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Saebvn (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.