Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Thajudeen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 23:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Thajudeen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely promotional, plagiarised article. Non-notable. I couldn't find any sources other than his own websites. Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 19:45, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant Keep. The article was a terrible promotional junkpile, so I trimmed it. If one actually searches in Google books or Gnews, there are many sources. Being in two museum collections means automatic notability via WP:ARTIST. needs at least one source to be added or could be deleted via PROD.104.163.148.25 (talk) 02:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(21 minutes later) I've added nine sources, one of which is an Oxford dictionary of islamic art... so perhaps time to withdraw this AfD? 104.163.148.25 (talk) 03:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.