Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Sri Lilashahji Maharaj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Sri Lilashahji Maharaj

Swami Sri Lilashahji Maharaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 20:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 20:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. seems notable to me, as founder of the religion. Other members not though. More sources from print newspapers would be nice.Yobmod (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The material in this article could be merged into Asaram Bapu. For the article to stand alone, it must have reliable sources that establish the subject as notable by himself. He might have a notable disciple, but for himself, there are no reliable sources for a stand alone article. Also, to be specific, he did not found a major religoius tradition, though he does have a disciple who carries on his work in Asaram Bapu. This is an idea on how to salvage the information in this article. By himself, there are no reliable sources to confer notablity. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 12:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Ja, Merge as above would work for me too.Yobmod (talk) 15:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.