Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Chetanananda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect doesn't seem to be appropriate. ansh 666 20:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Chetanananda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page was CSD'd unsuccessfully a while ago in 2009. Besides the fact the page would need a whole lot of cleaning, the problem is notability. I would assume the Vedanta Society of St. Louis, USA, is not such a large organization that WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES would apply. I found no independent sources for ""Swami Chetanananda" Ramakrishna, though (as hinted by the opening sentence in the current article) this other guy tends to clutter the search results. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 19:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Vedanta Society Not seeing enough to establish notability. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have now provided external links to two Missouri newspaper article mentions of Swami Chetanananda. Please consider unmarking this page from the deletion list. Thanks! @srinidhim2004 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.11.109.29 (talk) 00:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Kansas City Star source is a conference announcement, not really "in-depth coverage" as required per WP:GNG. The Saint Louis Post Dispatch source is not covering the person with sufficient detail either, but it could be a source for a Vedanta Society of Saint Louis article. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 08:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete two local notices only. DGG ( talk ) 03:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion of redirection?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 04:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (nom) redirecting right now would violate WP:SURPRISE, and I see little sense in adding a sentence "the Vedanta society of St. Louis is headed by (this guy)" to the Vedanta Society article. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 09:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kagundu Talk To Me 03:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG clearly lacks third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.