Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Urban Development Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sustainable Urban Development Network

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ORG. All articles on this topic were generated by the parent organization. No significant independent reporting seems to exist. BruceThomson (talk) 09:44, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldnt find any other sources as well, fails GNG and NCOMPNAY.`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 02:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep: The topic is noteworthy, however the tone is promotional and might be improved. Obtains WP:GNG. Tictictoc (talk) 14:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC) striking confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Anyone who knows of independent coverage of the topic should post links. BruceThomson (talk) 11:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.