Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Family Gelände (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Super Family Gelände

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As the article itself notes, this game had only a very limited release. Three of the cited sources are simple database entries with no significant coverage, and the other three are used to source a digression on skiing etymology and do not even mention the article subject. Previous AfD has lots of off-topic ranting to wade through, but the keep votes seem to be based on three plainly flawed arguments. One is that the game is the spiritual predecessor to We Ski (not only is this unsourced, but the keep votes admit this claim is based on the logic that any game made by a company is by definition a spiritual successor to any previous game they made in the same genre). Two is that mentions in GameFAQs, Mobygames, and primary sources serve to establish notability. Three is that WP:Articles for deletion/Gaia Saver establishes a precedent (I find the "keep" rationales in that AfD flawed as well, and will be re-nominating it). Martin IIIa (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Martin IIIa (talk) 14:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Primary sources do not establish notability on Wikipedia, and the database-like sources don't either. Nothing would be different if there were a relation with We Ski, as that doesn't establish notability on this subject either. ~Mable (chat) 19:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per my argument at the last AFD. I can't believe it was kept last time. I probably would have taken the last one to DRV had I known how that worked 6 years ago. Sergecross73 msg me 21:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find any coverage in RSs, including Japanese ones like Famitsu.--IDV^talk 12:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.