Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stress Field Detector

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stress Field Detector

Stress Field Detector (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have tried to improve but not enough verifiable non-related party links to meet standards. Previous versions of page included references to homemade youtube videos as references. Assertions what technology can and cannot do need to be verified. NPOV problems discussed on talk page. Popayan (talk) 00:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I've fixed the page set up here so apologies If I've messed something up or missed something off, –Davey2010 • (talk) 00:40, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as (a) original research, or (b) as being badly sourced: several links are dead. Bearian (talk) 17:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 05:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I found a couple of the dead links, but they were about commercial applications. No information about how it works except that it is a "unique quantum method". The article itself says there is no published info. It's probably proprietary. Might find more if someone checked for patents, but that would be WP:OR. – Margin1522 (talk) 12:27, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.