Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonefield Query

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stonefield Query

Stonefield Query (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software, no reliable sources provided, none found. TNXMan 16:44, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. Doesn't seem notable to me; a search pulled up a few news sources from techy-type websites like i-newswire.com, mostly announcing new releases and such. The article seems way too promotional ("The founders had a vision..."), and we could do without it. ~Adjwilley (talk) 18:41, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Lots of press releases. The only coverage that I could find that wasn't a press release or a product/ version announcement was this item. Insufficient coverage to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find anything more than a few passing mentions in fully independent and reliable sources. And although not relevant, it seems that the article may have been created by the company's CEO, which explains its promotional nature.  —SMALLJIM  22:49, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.