Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling Yatéké

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sterling Yatéké

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] Pelmeen10 (talk) 20:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

keep per above. Pelmeen10 (talk) 20:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - almost all of the sources above are basic transfer announcements, most regarding the same transfer. I would say that the best source is Telegram, by far. There are other small articles like Sportcom, which help us to build a biography, albeit not a hugely substantial one. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, per sources found, per de:Sterling Yateke @GiantSnowman: Pelmeen10 posted a lot of hits there, although it's WP:ROUTINE I also feel the coverage is just a basic GNG pass. Govvy (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep not the best sourcing, but it's just enough for notability with the additional sourcing given above. Oaktree b (talk) 13:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above scrapes through WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - just about meets GNG. Giant Snowman 15:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.