Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stealth Cues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stealth Cues

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains claims of importance enough to fail A7 but I cannot find any significant coverage in reliable sources (minor mentions such as [1] in local newspapers is all I could find).

Fails notability guideline for corporations and general notability guideline. So Why 08:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Quite a famous seller of cues. Yet, I couldn't find sources confirming notability. Fails ORG/GNG. Lourdes 09:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No in-depth coverage (really any coverage), just products listed for sale. Fails WP:NCORP. MB 00:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.