Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ste Richardsson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ste Richardsson

Ste Richardsson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing coverage in independent sources. Tacyarg (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. J947 ^(c), at 04:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. J947 ^(c), at 04:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. J947 ^(c), at 04:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:BIO.--Pontificalibus 06:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Note The article is an autobiography ([1]). I have nominated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terri O'Sullivan, a page created by the same user about an associate with a similar level of notability.--Pontificalibus 10:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This man has not received coverage from a reliable source. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 11:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and WP:SNOW as per nom and Pontificalibus. Mramoeba (talk) 13:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• This just came up on my watchlist which I think is probably meant to go here. Mramoeba (talk) 14:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:SIGVOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• note the author seems to agree the article wasn't a good idea, this can be G7'd per [2] 78.28.54.83 (talk) 22:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.