Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stainoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. Self-advertisement - NN performer Alexf^(talk) 19:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stainoff

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has a claim of significance with "Stainoff's First studio album Rocketbee (2023), debuted number one in South Africa", however this is false as far as I can tell. Does not have SIGCOV. Mvqr (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Africa. Mvqr (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Worth noting that this is an autobiography. RetroCosmos (talk) 15:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RetroCosmos: yeah then it definitely needs to be draftified at least. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I wonder if it is possible to remove the statement as false and unsourced and then tag it under WP:A7? Or just tag it under WP:G11 Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This can easily pass G11 in my view RetroCosmos (talk) 15:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not a G11 in my view, it isn't a blatant advert. The relevant speedy criteria would be WP:G3 as a "blatant hoax", but I feel it is borderline. Many admins would delete it as G3, but some would not. --Mvqr (talk) 15:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - If the first album by an unknown beginner debuted at #1 in a major country, it would make the news. All this rapper has is the usual social media pages and self-uploads of a few songs that have generated no notice from anyone else whatsoever. The procedural discussion on speedy deleting above is not really necessary and could actually be a distraction; such an obvious failure of notability can be deleted today or next week. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per @Doomsdayer520’s comment. (My bold isn’t working, I’m editing from mobile currently. It prints as ‘’’.)

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 17:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Autobiography of a non-notable individual, they even vandalized Nasty C and put their details there moments ago. dxneo (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.