Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stag light

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Lighthouse keeper. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stag light

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

merge to lighthouse keeper as the issue of staffing with families ought to be dealt with there. Mangoe (talk) 22:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per User:Mangoe. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per Mangoe. Having found a couple of fractionally better passing references I've shifted slightly away from suggesting deletion on the grounds of it being just a colloquial term. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per Mangoe, a better option than simple deletion...Jokulhlaup (talk) 09:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.