Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sripad Aindra Das

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sripad Aindra Das

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability.Gaura79 (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete per nom. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 23:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable ISKCON religious leader. Please see; Aindra Das Last Darshan, Aindra Dasa: Living Still in Sound, Samadhi Established for ISKCON Kirtan Singer Aindra Dasa, D.C. Devotees Honor Aindra Dasa and 9/11 with Spiritual Peace Formula, In Loving Memory of Aindra Das, and Aindra Das Passes Away In Vrindavan. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 04:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We can now remove this template. It is not a nominee for deletion any more. It is in the editing process so let's wait and see how it turns out before you start nominating it for deletion.. Gaura79. Wow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coderpun (talk • contribs) 15:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No we can't remove the template until the discussion is closed by an administrator. Yes the only delete !voter has struck his !vote and changed to "keep" but the nominator has not withdrawn his nomination and there is not enough discussion to make a call. One !vote is not enough so I have relisted the discussion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As for the sources mentioned above by Ism schism — These are all from internal Hare Krishna media, hardly a basis for Wikipedia notability.

Accusativen hos Olsson (talk) 03:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- a prominent leader and a controversial figure, well known outside of the sect, need also to check hindi media. [1][2].--Wikid ^as© 10:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not good sources according to Wikipedia standards. The first is a prayer book by a well-known Hare Krishna leader, the second is a hindu blog.

Accusativen hos Olsson (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — No reliable sources. Further, the article is an extremely bad composition, with absurdly hyperbolic and religious language. See also the article's talk page. Accusativen hos Olsson (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.