Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Nagendra Perumal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a rather weak delete given the low participation. If it were not for a challenged Prod in the editing history I'd label this a "soft delete." But there are no Keep votes after two relists so here we are. Even so, if anyone has any heartburn over this drop me a line on my talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Nagendra Perumal

Sri Nagendra Perumal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable as per WP:GNG. One of literally millions of temples in India. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, it is not presumed notable just because it is a temple. Fails the GNG. — Quasar G. 16:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.