Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Vidya Ramayanam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sree Vidya Ramayanam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This uncited work could well be a hoax or a highly non-notable work based on the Ramayana. Could not find a ref to prove that it is notable. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 16:28, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless someone can identify reliable sources. The only sources that I could find were mirror publications that copied the article's content from Wikipedia, thus failing WP:CIRCULAR and WP:GNG.- Mr X 17:19, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 00:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: There appears to have been a snafu here in relisting this discussion--Czar relisted it and added it to the July 9 log page, then Joe Decker added another relist template, reverted himself, but then commented out Czar's listing on the log page. Now re-added to the current log page.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Finngall ^talk 06:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unreferenced. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.