Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Narayanapuram Thrikkayil Temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. Discussion about a merge can continue on an article talk page if desired. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sree Narayanapuram Thrikkayil Temple

Sree Narayanapuram Thrikkayil Temple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since 2 years, non-notable local temple claiming no notability failing WP:GNG. De-PRODing editor can write as many lines in the article of the town after providing WP:RS. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge, probably to List of Hindu temples in Kerala, if sufficient sourcing is not found during this AFD to keep this separate, although I tend to believe it is in fact significant. There is ongoing similar AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilimarathukavu Temple where it is noted that another AFD found that merely being 200 years old is not sufficient to establish Wikipedia-notability of a church as a separate article (and I agree). But also there is current need to develop list-articles on temples in India, with inbound redirects from temple names, in part to head off zillions of separate article creations and AFDs (that seem to be picking up in pace). Redirects are cheap, and there is no problem with the redirect left behind. Merging may motivate discussion at Talk:List of Hindu temples in Kerala about the notability standards for items in that list, which can be quite lower than standard for separate articles. Or perhaps discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject India is needed. The list-article in Kerala and others like it need to be developed and are not in great form now; good general sources should be found (perhaps like some suggested at the Kilimarathukavu Temple AFD). I !vote for more constructive processes, rather than complete eliminations of temples that are in fact probably very old and significant and which have photos and so on, Support emerging editors rather than squelching them. ;) --doncram 18:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.